Wednesday Night Hike
July 19, 2006
Wanderings somewhere around Twin Lakes
(Big Cottonwood Canyon)


Signboard along the Twin Lakes trail - just before it starts climbing.  Click in image for a view of the informational signboard.
Twin Lakes trail marker sign
Weather:  Cloudy, cool, and rainy - threatening thunder and lightning.
Present were:
  Gordon, K7HFV;  Bruce, KI7OM;  Tim, KK7EF; Mike, K7DOU;  Ron, K7RJ;  Clint, KA7OEI
Destination:  In the Twin Lakes area - sort of...
Question of the day:  "Does this look like it could be the place?"
Total distance (GPS):   3.18 miles, round trip for Ron, Gordon and I;  Probably about 3.75 miles or so for those who circumnavigated the lake.
Times:  Depart vehicles:  1851;  Begin climbing trail to Twin Lakes:  1905;  Arrive at Twin Lakes Dam:  1934;  We decide to go to the south shore of the lake:  2019;  Group reunites:  2045;  Start back down the trail:  2100;  Reach Silver Lake:  2126;  Arrive at vehicles:  2132
Altitudes in feet ASL (GPS approx):  Trailhead (parking lot):  8750;  Base of Dam:  9450;  Water level: About 9490
Distances (approx) from trailhead in miles:  Past Silver Lake, where the trail to Twin begins to climb:  0.4;  To the base of Twin Lakes Dam:  1.15 miles.
Altitude gain/loss in ft (approx.):   800.
Local sunset on this date:  2053  (we've lost about 8 minutes of sunlight - we are losing nearly 1 minute per day now)
Total 2006 WNH mileage (if you've gone on all of the hikes thus far)31.0 miles approx.
Total number of footsteps (estimated - I forgot my pedometer again...)Approximately 7200 (about 28 inches/step)  This makes an estimated 76240 steps hiked during this WNH season.

Images (.JPG format):

Comment:  Being that it was fairly dark and rainy, fewer pictures were taken than normal.  Of those that were, more than the usual number of them suffered from technical problems such as blurring due to long shutter times, slight misfocus, or the fact that the lens had water on its objective, thus blurring the image.  For this reason, many of these images have been reduced to half-size and/or have been processed in some way to reduce the effects of the blurring due to motion or misfocusing.
Maps/profiles:
Notes: In the parking lot, the two popular choices were Catherine Pass/Sunset Peak (maybe taking a pass on the peak if the weather threatened too much rain or lightning...) or to do the Twin Lakes-Lake Solitude loop:  We chose the latter, initially...

Several years ago, in digging around through some family picture archives, I ran across some photos taken up Big Cottonwood Canyon in the Brighton area.  In the early 1900's, some of my relatives (on my mother's grandmother's side - the Cutler and Felt families, specifically) would regularly get together in the Brighton area for a sort of family gathering.  The photos that I have found were taken in various places near the Brighton Bowl - some atop mountains, and several taken in areas of the lakes.

The photos in question were taken in July of 1913 see below - just before either the Lake Mary or Twin Lakes dams were built:  I was curious to see if I could figure out exactly where the photographer was when three of these pictures were taken - or if it was even possible to do so.  One of these pictures was apparently taken from the trail to Twin Lakes and looked down upon Silver Lake and the then-extant Balsam Lodge on its shore while the other two were clearly taken of the Twin Lakes themselves.  The first picture - the one of Silver Lake - is, I believe, fairly well-matched and the vantage point is along the trail to twin lakes (although up the road a bit to provide clear view of the lake) which was, at one time, probably the main road to the Black Bess shaft and other workings.

As mentioned before, we'd originally planned to simply do the "Twin Lakes to Lake Solitude" loop - a route that (mostly) kept clear of high, exposed ridges susceptible to lightning - but as we got to Twin Lakes, it started to rain lightly.  Also, Gordon and Ron, intrigued by the three photographs (and somewhat swayed by the rain) decided that the Lake Solitude portion could wait for another day and that perhaps a circumnavigation of Twin would be an acceptable substitute.  At the end of the hike, we decided that this had been a good decision as there are portions of the trail below Lake Solitude that tend to be somewhat slippery even when dry and are treacherously muddy when wet.

Ron, Gordon and I began to look for the site at which one of the pictures (the middle set of four, below) was taken while the rest of the group continued their circumnavigation of the lake.  One of the pictures was apparently taken on the North shore of the lake somewhere, looking to the South and West into a bowl west of Millicent.  We were (more or less) able to match some of the background features of this picture and could tell that it was most likely taken somewhere along eastern half of the north shore of the lake, but we were unable to find the rocky outcrop in the foreground.

From our best guess at the time, we finally figured that the picture was most likely taken from a point a few hundred feet to the west of the dam and that the rocky outcrop in the picture had probably been quarried to provide aggregate for the dam and that finding the vantage point was likely to be fruitless.

Upon writing this and more-closely studying the pictures (something that could not be easily done by looking at the increasingly water-soaked laser-printed copy of the picture) one can begin to see the scale of the rock, its relative height above the pre-dam water level, and the relative size of the features with respect to the four people clearly visible in the picture.  If you look at the man on the left side of the outcrop, it is clear that he is sitting at a point that is only about 15 feet above the water.  Knowing that the current water level of the Twin Lakes is at least 50 feet above it's "pre-dam" water level, it's safe to say that we were right about not being able to duplicate the vantage point of this picture for the simple reason that this rocky outcrop - if it still exists - is under the surface of the Twin Lakes.

Having decided that this second picture was likely to be "un-reproducible" without the use of scuba gear or high explosives (neither option was entertained seriously...) we moved onto the last of the three pictures.  Upon looking at this picture a year or so ago, Gordon and I determined that it would have had to have been taken somewhere along the southern shore of the lake - probably toward the west end.  In this picture, in the background, one can clearly see Scott's Hill and some other features along that ridgeline.  Judging by where this distant ridge intersected with the nearer ridge descending from Mount Evergreen, we hoped to be able to find the approximate location of this picture.

Complicating this task was the fact that this was a "pre-dam" picture:  In the "mid-background" one can see the opposite (the northeast) shore of the Twin Lakes in a (more or less) pristine state and how the ridge from Mount Evergreen intercepted the shoreline.  With the dam present and with the higher water level, this geometry is disturbed, making a direct comparison impossible, requiring the observer to visualize how it might have been.

Originally, we thought that this vantage point was from the large rocky outcropping in the middle of the south-southeastern shore of the lake, but before we got to this rock along the trail that follows this shoreline, we could see that we were already too far along the shore and the that picture had clearly been taken at a spot much closer to the dam.  Backtracking, we move toward the north and east along the lake and, at a place a few hundred feet behind the dam, along the shore, we found what we believe to be about as close to the spot of the original picture as one could get.

Interestingly, it would seem that the original Twin Lakes extended farther to the east than it does now:  If you look at the old picture carefully, you can see that the northeast shore is a rocky ridge - and this is probably the same ridge (or the remains of it - it is possible that some or most of the original shore was  quarried or removed during the dam's construction) on which the ski lift now sits - which means that the lake itself probably went a few hundred feet farther in that direction.  This also means that the water level of the present Twin Lakes reservoir is higher than the original Twin Lakes by nearly the height of the dam itself, which means that the water is at least 50 feet higher than before.

At about the time that we decided that we were in about the same place as the original photographer (or as close as we could get to it, judging from the now nearly-disintegrated copy of the picture) the rest of the group (with whom we had maintained radio contact) completed their circumnavigation of the lake and met up with us.  Starting down from the south side of the dam, we stopped, not being able to avoid noticing a large bull moose happily munching away along the side of the road that was also our trail.  After several minutes of staring at the moose, we started moving toward it fairly slowly:  Before we were within a hundred feet or so, it began to move off, down the road, so we maintained our pace:  Ultimately, he didn't seem to want to get any closer to us than we did to him, so we simply steered clear of each other.

The hike back down to Silver Lake was uneventful except for the fact that it, being only 9 pm, was still light enough to follow the trail without need of flashlight - a strange occurrence, it seemed.  At about the time we reached the vehicles, it had mostly stopped raining and Tim, who had met us at Brighton because he had already been staying up there, continued to stay there while the rest of us wandered down the canyon, to the parking lot, and then most of the remaining group had a dime-lime at the TGI Friday's near Cottonwood Mall.


Pictures:  Now and then:

Below are some old pictures were taken in the vicinity of Twin Lakes during the summer of 1913 - about 2 years before the dam was built.  In each case, the old image is shown on the left while the newer images have been converted to black-and-white, contrast-adjusted, and then cropped to more-closely resemble the view and tone of the old images.

The old 1913 image of Silver Lake and a newer image taken from approximately the same location.  The large building in the old picture is the "Log Cabin Hotel" - also known as variously as the Balsam Inn or Balsam Hotel.  Built around 1910, it operated until it burned to the ground on March 21, 1937  Various incarnations of this structure were built and rebuilt until it burned for the for the third and final time in 1959 - after which the owners opened the "Balsam Embers" restaurant in Salt Lake.  Click on either image for a full-sized version.
Silver Lake and the Balsam Lodge, July 1913 The Silver Lake area - image taken from near the location of the 1913 photo.

In the above picture, it is apparent that the "new" vantage point is somewhat higher in elevation and farther to the south and west than that from which the old picture was taken:  To take a picture closer to that of the original location it would be necessary to be farther down the trail and bushwhack a bit to find a clear vantage point.

The upper-left picture was taken in July of 1913 and shows a view across the Twin Lakes, before the dam was built.  The upper-left picture was taken in July of 1913 and shows a view across the Twin Lakes, before the dam was built.  Click on an image for a larger version.
The upper-left picture was taken in July of 1913 and shows a view across the Twin Lakes, before the dam was built. 





Twin Lakes - then and now.  The original July, 1913 image is in the Upper Left corner while the other three images are from various vantage points, trying to replicate the original as much as possible.  Click on any of the four images for a full-sized version.




View of the Twin Lakes, July 1913
Original July, 1913 picture.
An attempt to find a similar vantage point of the same view
An attempt to find a similar vantage point of the same view
An attempt to find a similar vantage point of the same view

If you look carefully at the original picture, you can see four people on the rocky outcrop:  Looking carefully at the person on the far left, you can see that he is sitting only about 10-15 feet above the waterline.  Because the dam raised the water level by 40 feet or more - and most certainly increased the size of the lake itself - it is unlikely that the original vantage point can be replicated easily, not knowing where the now-underwater rocky outcrop might be - assuming that it still exists.  In looking at the original 1913 image, it is possible to just make out the large rock, across the lake, through the tree in the foreground.  Compare, in this picture, how far above the waterline that this rock sits - and then compare it to how far above the water the rock is today.

The other three images are various attempts to find, as best as can be done, a vantage point similar to the original.  It is likely that this image may have been taken very close to what is now the shoreline of the reservoir - but until/unless the water is low enough to possibly see the outcrop, we probably won't know...

The image on the left was taken in July of 1913 while the one on the right is a very recent picture.  In the background, one can recognize Scott's Hill and other features nearby.  Click on either image for a full-sized version.
TTwin Lake, July 1913 - looking to the Northwest
Original July, 1913 picture.
Twin Lakes, looking to the northwest - near the location of the old image.

Update:  After looking at the photographs, we determined that the above picture could not have been Twin Lakes, but was more likely to be Lake Mary.  This suspicion was confirmed on our August 16 Catherine Pass hike.


The right-hand image shows a view of Twin Lakes looking toward the northeast with the recognizable features of Scott's Hill and some of the other distant features in the background.  In comparison of the new and old images, one thing becomes readily apparent:  The northeast boundary of the lake was likely farther to the north and east than the current dam.  Although it's difficult to tell, it's likely that the rocky ridge making up the far shore seen in the center and right of the old picture are those close to where the current ski lift sits - but it is also likely that their height was considerably reduced to prepare the base for the dam as well as to provide building materials for the dam itself.

In closely scrutinizing these last pictures, it would appear that the "new" picture wasn't taken from quite the right location:  Ron opined that the old one may have been taken from a vantage point still higher up the side of the mountain - and maybe somewhat farther to the south and west - and I suspect that he may be right...

About Twin Lakes dam:
According to Keller, Twin Lakes dam was constructed in the summer of 1915 at a cost of about $72,000 and it has a full-pool capacity of about 300 million gallons (approx. 921 acre-feet.)  With much of the infrastructure to haul the raw material already having been put into place during the construction of the Lake Mary dam which had been mostly finished the summer before, but not completed until that summer.  The raw materials were first shipped by rail to Park City and then hauled to Brighton by wagon - and then by light wagon or pack animals from Brighton to the construction site itself.  It was during this period that the familiar Lake Mary to Twin Lakes trail was built.

Comments:



Wanna send email?

Go to the 2006 Wednesday Night Hike page, or main Wednesday Night Hike index page.

Historical info about Twin Lakes was taken from "The Lady in the Ore Bucket" by Charles Keller

This page maintained by Clint Turner, KA7OEI and was last updated on 20070611 (Copyright 2006-2007 by Clint Turner.  All rights on images and text are reserved.)